NATHAN WHITING : SMALL SPLASHES TOUCH THE SHORE
DIANE PAYNE : Vulnerable
GUY DEBORD : The Culmination of Separation
POETRYREPAIRS v11.09:049
contemporary international poetry - for your reading pleasure,
poetry from new and established poets and essays on writing


All the fine arts are species of poetry--Samuel Taylor Coleridge




for mature audience over 18 BACK
SMALL SPLASHES TOUCH THE SHORE Vulnerable The Culmination of Separation  
POETRY requires a mature audience ENTER only if you are 18+ under 18? klik here

NATHAN WHITING
SMALL SPLASHES TOUCH THE SHORE
Dead boats unfold slowly in the creek, their ribs mute flocks, gulls seated and moss Stays green in winter. Old Barges bleed if iron, the wooden ones tasted by tides where they reach shore to join mud's jail people call a view Word I speak also know ribs as they unfold to chant their life tidal moods silver to imagination which reflects bright sun asparkle, throat's tiny, ocean inlet of air gives nouns made of sunken ships, a rotting choir locked by snail tongues.
POETRYREPAIRS12.05:049
link to poetryrepairs
I have many things to write unto you but   I will not write with pen and ink
--JOHN the theologian



LinkedIn® professional networking

FIND home

SMALL SPLASHES TOUCH THE SHORE Vulnerable
The Culmination of Separation
 
POETRY requires a mature audience ENTER only if you are 18+ under 18? klik here

DIANE PAYNE
Vulnerable
A woman weeps over an unburned candle left in a bedside drawer, certain the dead man was waiting for her arrival as the opportunity to finally light that wick. The dead man can not explain that the candle was stashed near the bed in case the power went out during a storm.
POETRYREPAIRS yy.MM: 049
Poetry endangers the established order  of the soul - Plato



Chapter 1 of Guy Debord's The Society of the Spectacle (Paris, 1967). Translated by Ken Knabb. Reprinted, with permission, from the Bureau of Public Secrets

HAIKU

guidelines INDEX
SMALL SPLASHES TOUCH THE SHORE Vulnerable
The Culmination of Separation
 
POETRY requires a mature audience ENTER only if you are 18+ under 18? klik here
GUY DEBORD
The Culmination of Separation
“But for the present age, which prefers the sign to the thing signified, the copy to the original, representation to reality, appearance to essence . . . truth is considered profane, and only illusion is sacred. Sacredness is in fact held to be enhanced in proportion as truth decreases and illusion increases, so that the highest degree of illusion comes to be the highest degree of sacredness.”

—Feuerbach, Preface to the second edition of The Essence of Christianity



1 In societies where modern conditions of production prevail, life is presented as an immense accumulation of spectacles. Everything that was directly lived is now merely represented in the distance.

2 The images detached from every aspect of life merge into a common stream in which the former unity of life can no longer be recovered. Reality viewed fragmentarily regroups itself into its own new unity as a separate pseudoworld, an object of mere contemplation. The specialization of images of the world culminates in a world of autonomous images whose delusion deludes even itself. The spectacle is a concrete inversion of life, an autonomous movement of the nonliving.

3 The spectacle appears simultaneously as society itself, as a part of society, and as a means of unification. As a part of society, it is the focal point of vision and consciousness. Due to the very fact that this sector is separate, it is at the same time the domain of delusion and false consciousness: the unification it achieves is nothing but an official language of universal separation.

4 The spectacle is not a collection of images; it is a social relation between people that is mediated by images.

5 The spectacle cannot be understood as a mere visual deception produced by mass-media technologies. It is a worldview that has actually been materialized.

6 Understood in its totality, the spectacle is both the result and the goal of the dominant mode of production. It is not a mere decoration added to the real world. It is the very heart of this real society’s unreality. In all its particular manifestations — news, propaganda, advertising, entertainment — the spectacle represents the dominant model of life. It is the omnipresent affirmation of the choices that have already been made in the sphere of production and in the consumption implied by that production. In both form and content the spectacle serves as a total justification of the conditions and goals of the existing system. The spectacle also represents the constant presence of this justification since it monopolizes the majority of the time spent outside the production process.

7 Separation is itself an integral part of the unity of the world, of a global social practice split into reality and image. The social practice confronted by an apparently autonomous spectacle is at the same time the real totality which contains that spectacle. But the split within this totality mutilates it to the point that the spectacle seems to be its goal. The language of the spectacle consists of signs of the dominant organization of production — signs which are at the same time the ultimate end-products of that organization.

8 The spectacle cannot be abstractly contrasted to concrete social activity: each side of such a duality is itself divided. The spectacle that falsifies reality is nevertheless a real product of that reality. Conversely, real life is materially invaded by the contemplation of the spectacle, and ends up absorbing it and aligning itself with it. Objective reality is present on both sides. Each concept established in this manner has no other basis than its transformation into its opposite: reality emerges within the spectacle, and the spectacle is real. This reciprocal alienation is the essence and support of the existing society.

9 In a world that is really turned upside down, the true is a moment of the false.

10 The concept of “the spectacle” interrelates and explains a wide range of seemingly unconnected phenomena. The apparent diversities and contrasts of these phenomena stem from the social organization of appearances, whose essential nature must itself be recognized. Considered in its own terms, the spectacle is an affirmation of appearances and an identification of all human social life with those appearances. But a critique that grasps the spectacle’s essential character reveals it to be a visible negation of life — a negation of life that has taken on a visible form.

11 In order to describe the spectacle, its formation, its functions, and the forces that work against it, it is necessary to make some artificial distinctions. In analyzing the spectacle we are obliged to a certain extent to use the spectacle’s own language, in the sense that we have to move through the methodological terrain of the society that expresses itself in the spectacle. For the spectacle is both the meaning and the agenda of our particular socio-economic formation. It is the historical moment in which we are caught.

12 The spectacle presents itself as a vast and inaccessible reality that can never be questioned. Its sole message is: “What appears is good, what is good appears.” The passive acceptance it demands is already effectively imposed by its monopoly of appearances, its manner of appearing without leaving room for any reply.

13 The tautological character of the spectacle stems from the fact that its means and ends are identical. It is the sun that never sets over the empire of modern passivity. It covers the entire surface of the globe, endlessly basking in its own glory.

14 The society based on modern industry is not accidentally or superficially spectacular, it is fundamentally spectaclist. In the spectacle — the visual reflection of the ruling economic order — goals are nothing, development is everything. The spectacle aims at nothing other than itself.

15 As indispensable packaging of currently produced objects, as general articulation of the system’s rationales, and as advanced economic sector that directly creates an ever-increasing mass of image-objects, the spectacle is the primary product of present-day society.

16 The spectacle is able to subject human beings to itself precisely because the economy has already totally subjugated them. It is nothing other than the economy developing for itself. It is at once a faithful reflection of the production of things and a distorting objectification of the producers.

17 The first stage of the economy’s domination of social life brought about an evident degradation of being into having: human fulfillment was no longer equated with what one was, but with what one possessed. The present stage, in which social life has become completely dominated by the accumulated productions of the economy, is bringing about a general shift from having to appearing — all “having” must now derive its immediate prestige and its ultimate purpose from appearances. At the same time all individual reality has become social, in the sense that it is shaped by social forces and is directly dependent on them. Individual reality is allowed to appear only if it is not actually real.

18 When the real world is transformed into mere images, mere images become real beings — dynamic figments that provide the direct motivations for a hypnotic behavior. Since the spectacle’s job is to use various specialized mediations in order to show us a world that can no longer be directly grasped, it naturally elevates the sense of sight to the special preeminence once occupied by touch: the most abstract and easily deceived sense is the most readily adaptable to the generalized abstraction of present-day society. But the spectacle is not merely a matter of images, nor even of images plus sounds. It is whatever escapes people’s activity, whatever eludes their practical reconsideration and correction. It is the opposite of dialogue. Wherever representation becomes independent the spectacle regenerates itself.

19 The spectacle inherits the weakness of the Western philosophical project, which attempted to understand activity by means of the categories of vision, and it is based on the relentless development of the particular technical rationality that grew out of that form of thought. The spectacle does not realize philosophy, it philosophizes reality, reducing everyone’s concrete life to a universe of speculation.

20 Philosophy, the power of separate thought and the thought of separate power, was never by itself able to supersede theology. The spectacle is the material reconstruction of the religious illusion. Spectacular technology has not dispersed the religious mists where human beings had projected their own alienated powers; it has merely brought those mists down to earth, to the point that even the most mundane aspects of life have become impenetrable and unbreathable. The fallacious paradise that represented a total denial of earthly life is no longer projected into the heavens; it is embedded in earthly life itself. The spectacle is the technological version of the exiling of human powers into a “world beyond”; the culmination of humanity’s internal separation.

21 As long as necessity is socially dreamed, dreaming will remain a social necessity. The spectacle is the bad dream of a modern society in chains, and ultimately expresses nothing more than its desire to sleep. The spectacle is the guardian of that sleep.

22 The fact that the practical power of modern society has detached itself from that society and established an independent domain in the spectacle can only be explained by the fact that that powerful practice continued to lack cohesion and had remained in contradiction with itself.

23 The root of the spectacle is that oldest of all social specializations, the specialization of power. The spectacle plays the specialized role of speaking in the name of all the other activities. It is hierarchical society’s ambassador to itself, delivering its official messages at a court where no one else is allowed to speak. The most modern aspect of the spectacle is thus also the most archaic.

24 The spectacle is the ruling order’s nonstop discourse about itself, its never-ending monologue of self-praise, its self-portrait at the stage of totalitarian domination of all aspects of life. The fetishistic appearance of pure objectivity in spectacular relations conceals their true character as relations between people and between classes: a second Nature, with its own inescapable laws, seems to dominate our environment. But the spectacle is not the inevitable consequence of some supposedly natural technological development. On the contrary, the society of the spectacle is a form that chooses its own technological content. If the spectacle, considered in the limited sense of the “mass media” that are its most glaring superficial manifestation, seems to be invading society in the form of a mere technical apparatus, it should be understood that this apparatus is in no way neutral, and that it has been developed in accordance with the spectacle’s internal dynamics. If the social needs of the age in which such technologies are developed can be met only through their mediation, if the administration of this society and all contact between people has become totally dependent on these means of instantaneous communication, it is because this “communication” is essentially unilateral. The concentration of these media thus amounts to concentrating in the hands of the administrators of the existing system the means that enable them to carry on this particular form of administration. The social separation reflected in the spectacle is inseparable from the modern state — that product of the social division of labor that is both the chief instrument of class rule and the concentrated expression of all social divisions.

25 Separation is the alpha and omega of the spectacle. The institutionalization of the social division of labor in the form of class divisions had given rise to an earlier, religious form of contemplation: the mythical order with which every power has always camouflaged itself. Religion justified the cosmic and ontological order that corresponded to the interests of the masters, expounding and embellishing everything their societies could not deliver. In this sense all separate power has been spectacular. But this earlier universal devotion to a fixed religious imagery was only a shared acknowledgment of loss, an imaginary compensation for the poverty of a concrete social activity that was still generally experienced as a unitary condition. In contrast, the modern spectacle depicts what society could deliver, but in so doing it rigidly separates what is possible from what is permitted. The spectacle keeps people in a state of unconsciousness as they pass through practical changes in their conditions of existence. Like a factitious god, it generates itself and makes its own rules. It reveals itself for what it is: an autonomously developing separate power, based on the increasing productivity resulting from an ever more refined division of labor into parcelized gestures dictated by the independent movement of machines, and working for an ever-expanding market. In the course of this development, all community and all critical awareness have faded away; and the forces that were able to grow by separating from each other have not yet been reunited.

26 The general separation of worker and product tends to eliminate any consistent sense of accomplished activity and any direct personal communication between producers. With the increasing accumulation of separate products and the increasing concentration of the productive process, accomplishment and communication are monopolized by the managers of the system. The triumph of this separation-based economic system proletarianizes the whole world.

27 Due to the very success of this separate production of separation, the fundamental experience that in earlier societies was associated with people’s primary work is in the process of being replaced — at least in areas near the cutting edge of the system’s evolution — by an identification of life with nonworking time, with inactivity. But such inactivity is in no way liberated from productive activity: it remains dependent on it, in an uneasy and admiring submission to the requirements and consequences of the production system. It is itself one of the consequences of that system. There can be no freedom apart from activity; and within the spectacle activity is nullified, all real activity having been forcibly channeled into the global construction of the spectacle. Thus, what is referred to as a “liberation from work,” namely the modern increase in leisure time, is neither a liberation of work itself nor a liberation from the world shaped by this kind of work. None of the activity stolen by work can be regained by submitting to what that work has produced.

28 The reigning economic system is a vicious circle of isolation. Its technologies are based on isolation, and they contribute to that same isolation. From cars to television, the goods that the spectacular system chooses to produce also serve it as weapons for constantly reinforcing the conditions that engender “lonely crowds.” The spectacle recreates its own presuppositions ever more concretely.

29 The spectacle was born from the world’s loss of the unity, and the immense expansion of the modern spectacle reveals the enormity of this loss: the abstractification of all individual labor and the general abstractness of what is produced are perfectly reflected in the spectacle, whose manner of being concrete is precisely abstraction. In the spectacle, a part of the world presents itself to the world and is superior to it. The spectacle is the common language of this separation. Spectators are linked solely by their one-way relationship to the very center that keeps them isolated from each other. The spectacle thus reunites the separated, but it reunites them only in their separateness.

30 The alienation of the spectator, which reinforces the contemplated objects that result from his own unconscious activity, works like this: the more he contemplates, the less he lives; the more he identifies with the dominant images of need, the less he understands his own life and his own desires. The spectacle’s estrangement from the acting subject is expressed by the fact that the individual’s gestures are no longer his own; they are the gestures of someone else who represents them to him. The spectator feels at home nowhere, because the spectacle is everywhere.

31 Workers do not produce themselves; they produce a power independent of themselves. The success of this production, the abundance it generates, is experienced by the producers as an abundance of dispossession. As their alienated products accumulate, all time and space become foreign to them. The spectacle is the map of this new world, a map that is identical to the territory it represents. The forces that have escaped us show themselves to us in all their power.

32 The spectacle’s social function is the concrete manufacture of alienation. Economic expansion consists primarily of the expansion of this particular sector of industrial production. The “growth” generated by an economy developing for its own sake can be nothing other than a growth of the very alienation that was at its origin.

33 Though separated from what they produce, human beings nevertheless produce every detail of their world with ever-increasing power. They thus also find themselves increasingly separated from that world. The closer their life comes to being their own creation, the more they are excluded from that life.

34 The spectacle is capital accumulated to the point that it becomes images.

POETRYREPAIRS yy.MM: 049
bnr3
NATHAN WHITING : SMALL SPLASHES TOUCH THE SHORE
DIANE PAYNE : Vulnerable
GUY DEBORD : The Culmination of Separation

Not a state organ: POETRYREPAIRS accepts no monies from federal, state, or local governments. We relie on readers like you.

poetryrepairs prefers PayPal

Please contribute to maintain POETRYREPAIRS online. DONATE
free counters
NAVIGATION for mature audience over 18
BACK | comments + feedback on FACEBOOK | FIND| guidelines | home INDEX | LinkedIn® professional networking services |

submit editor@[sitename]
<