poetryrepairs 15.03:025

DAVID JAMES : Criminal Findings
DAVID L. JAMES: A Trail of No
KATICA KULAVKOVA : Black Moon

for your reading pleasure, verse
from new and established poets
poetry requires a mature audience,
if you are under 18 years of age, click here Big Fish


DAVID JAMES
Criminal Findings

“Scientists found that pigeons have trouble finding their way home if their right nostrils are plugged.” “Findings,” April 2011 in Harper’s
One long term case study verified that death would be imminent if victims were tied to concrete and dropped in the East River at midnight. Men and women of all sizes lose their breath when wire is twisted around their necks and pulled. The less a person eats, the more likely he is to lie under pressure. In several experiments, it was found that heroin, used judiciously, can keep prostitutes on the street for longer periods and make them less likely to fight or try to escape. Researchers found no cure for a knife thrust to the heart. In the short term, crime does pay. It was discovered recently, there is an application procedure to copyright one’s Mafia name. The outer skin is easier to remove when wet. Scientists found a chart used by hit men to determine the statistical likelihood of success by type of rifle or handgun. There is a mathematical formula used, in part, to calculate, in a ransom situation, the minimal amount to pay.

poetryrepairs #210 15,03:025





DAVID L. JAMES
A Trail of No

I like to tell my students about the worst rejection notice I ever received. I mailed a batch of poems to a west coast magazine; my self-addressed stamped envelope came back months later and I promptly opened it. Written across the top poem in red magic marker, in bold letters, was the message: THIS IS SHIT. I don’t tell them this story to frighten them, though it does. I tell them this story to model an attitude creative writers (and all artists, for that matter) must have if they are to survive: perseverance.

Most writers experience rejection frequently. It’s a state of being. What matters is how people react to this rejection and what they learn from it. In some respects, one might think of writers as people with the mandate to grow and persist against a barrage of messages that tells them they are not worthy. There is a constant flow of information coming in from outside that says, “You’re really not talented enough,” and yet, they must conjure up the fortitude to continue. The best advice I’ve heard about this process is to separate the creative-self from the business-self in writing. Treat the submission process in a business-like manner, remotely related to the creation or value of new work.

How many other people in professions encounter such a steady diet of rejection? Of course, there are inventors and scientists and researchers who must stomach failure over and over. Certainly phone solicitors have more than their fair share of rejection. But most people do not deal with rejection on such a consistent basis. It can be depressing. It can cause people to question and doubt their abilities, and even lead some to quit writing altogether. As Alan Shapiro states in a recent interview, “Everything about the literary life is not what it’s cracked up to be. It’s all fraught with frustration” (qtd. in Pfefferle 41). For example, Ray Bradbury collected around 800 rejections slips before selling his first story. Steven King’s Carrie was rejected 30 times. So why do writers continue to write and submit their work for rejection? What can be gained from pursuing such a trail of no?

Rejection can lead to introspection and reevaluation. Many times our work should be rejected. It’s not compelling enough. It’s not unique enough. In fact, early and easy success in publishing can harm writers. Richard Wilbur laments that one problem with the current writing scene is that “almost anything can get into print nowadays” (qtd. in Stimpson 52). Wilbur implies that there is value in working hard to get beyond or through rejection slips until one earns acceptance. This is one reason why the first book of many poets is their best book; they spent 8 or 9 years working on it before publication! Rejection can provide a cue to writers that they need to reread, reassess, re-envision, revise. Rejection can open up possibilities of new growth and experimentation for a writer, if viewed constructively.

There are several life lessons to be learned through rejection, including this: one does not always succeed. For example, regardless of how hard I try or how many times I submit, I have never been published in Poetry magazine. For thirty years now, I have been consistently rejected, and I accept that fact. In life, I experience rejection with the lottery, with grant proposals, with co-workers and students, with new job applications, with bids on used cars. Rejection of one form or another is a part of living, of growing up, and the sooner I learn to deal with it, the better. Eventually, this old heart of mine will reject my body and I will not succeed in living forever. It is easy to forget this important fact, but Anne Lamott reminds us in Bird by Bird that “publication is not going to change your life or solve your problems” (185).

Rejection can help writers understand that publication, like life, is not fair. The best poem or story doesn’t always get accepted just as the best person for the job is not always selected. Sometimes it’s who you know. Or it’s a matter of timing or mood. Selection is painfully subjective. A writer only needs one piece to get rejected twelve times before receiving an acceptance on the thirteenth submission to realize that fate, luck, and serendipity enter into the publication picture. Understanding that fact about life helps.

Lastly, rejection can focus a person’s commitment to the art form. Will the writer let the opinions of others determine his future? Or will he find the drive within, the conviction within, to continue writing because he finds value and joy in it even though the outside world consistently sends him negative messages? Saying yes to this last question is part of the definition of perseverance. Yet even perseverance does not guarantee success.

In an ideal world, I would prefer more acceptance letters than rejection slips. Most anyone would. But this is not an ideal world. And if my poems were accepted at every magazine I submitted to, my work would suffer in the long run. I would become lazy; I would begin to accept my own mediocrity as excellence. There would be no need to work long and hard on poems. I would settle for less from myself and view publication as a right, not a privilege or fringe benefit. Learning to live with rejection is intrinsically valuable in

And in the end, publication is not what drives people to write. It is an internal urge, a longing to say what must be said, a testament to one’s life. Writers are trying to make sense o f their joys, their desires, their questions, their experiences, their doubts, and their hurts. Those epiphanies can happen with or without publication. Anne Lamott states it more eloquently:
The great writers keep writing about the cold dark place within, the water under a frozen lake or the secluded camouflaged hole. The light they shine on this hole, this pit, helps us cut away or step around the brush and brambles; then we can dance around the rim of the abyss, holler into it, measure it, throw rocks in it, and still not fall in. It can no longer swallow us up. (197-198)
This “dancing,” as Lamott calls it, can occur to us if we write through the truth in our lives, whether we’re published, rejected, ignored, celebrated, or disdained.

Now, as a person who has come to terms with rejection in his life, I would like to publicly thank Poetry magazine (and so many others) for not accepting my work for the last thirty years: it has made me a better poet and a better person. I choose to believe this or else I would have stopped writing decades ago.

poetryrepairs #210 15,03:025





KATICA KULAVKOVA
Black Moon

I've got used to existing exclusively, at Black Moon while the time was measured at night as a woman is while they compared me to the snake the phallus and the dragon I perfected the technique of eclipsing, the adultery I have no reason to compete with people, I don't worship ideas and objects as they do, but I too am scared Djinn, Erot, by the dog side of thirst, insatiability, craving I too am tormented by rage, lunacy Satan, I keep on wishing for something young - New, Half, Full my mouth spumes from lifting lean meat my tongue from nibbling, probing from spirituality and superstition I too am scared by the sunrise at sunset gambling with light for only three days deceitful three days lunatic three threesided, three shortlived days I too am distressed that for a long time a very long time there is no reversal a moon phase, a white night of my moon belt, of your animal belt you space merry-go-round, you male anathema my Sun.

poetryrepairs #210 15,03:025







thank you for reading poetryrepairs
please link to http://www.poetryrepairs.com/v15/025.html
link to POETRYREPAIRS




All the fine arts are species of poetry--Samuel Taylor Coleridge


poetry repairs your heart
even as it splits it open.
VIRGINIA WOOLF
The Art of Reading






Our Dancing Poet Logo! FIND GIFT BUY GIFT @ http://www.zazzle.com/poetryrepairshop




No state organ: POETRYREPAIRS
accepts NO money from federal,
state, or local governments.
READERS maintain poetryrepairs.


I have many things to write unto you but
I will not write with pen and ink
--JOHN the theologian


free counters


REPAIR: resort, frequent or habitual going; concourse or confluence of people at or in a place; making one's way; to go, betake oneself, to arrive; return to a place; to dwell; to recover, heal, or cure; to renew; to fix to original condition. -- Oxford English Dictionary





READ MORE POETRY

DAVID L. JAMES writes from Farmington Hills, Michigan, where he teaches at Oakland COmmunity COllege. Works Cited:
Lamott, Anne. Bird by Bird. New York: Anchor Books, 1995.
Pfefferle, W.T. “Poets on Place.” Poets and Writers (Jan./Feb. 2005): 38-41.
Stimpson, Henry. “Catching Up With Poet Richard Wilbur.” Poets and Writers (Jan./Feb. 2005): 51-53.

Born in 1951, Veles, Republic of Macedonia. KATICA KULAVKOVA is a poet, theoretician of literature and literary essayist. Professor of Theory of Literature and Literary Hermeneutics at the Department of General and Comparative Literature on the Faculty of Philology, "Sts. Cyril and Methodius" University, Skopje. Her memberships and activities include the Macedonian Academy of Arts and Sciences, Chair of the Translation and Linguistic Rights Committee of P.E.N. International, Editor-in-Chief of the international multilingual P.E.N. E-collection DIVERSITY (www.diversity.org.mk).

poetryrepairs editor: "the genius among editors accept my work; the idiots do not." --John Horvath Jr


UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 16.
• (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
• (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
• (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.


TOP